Resources
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
LET UTAH READ MEMBER ORGANIZATIONS JOINT VETO LETTER ON HB 29
The Far-Reaching Consequences of HB374: The “Sensitive Materials” law in Utah
THE FACTS / MESSAGING
AMERICANS OPPOSE BOOK BANNING
Americans oppose book bans, don’t believe that there are problematic books on the shelves, and believe books shouldn’t be removed when parents complain
[source: Deseret News / BYU "American Family Survey]Only 12% of Americans agree that books should be removed from libraries if a parent objects.
Only 16% believe public school libraries include inappropriate books on their shelves. (source: American Family Survey (BYU/Deseret News)
65% said it was important for public school libraries to represent a variety of perspectives about controversial issues — even if it makes some people uncomfortable.
“The public really doesn’t like book banning,” said Jeremy C. Pope, professor of political science at Brigham Young University and co-investigator for the survey.
Just 8% of voters think there are many books that are inappropriate and should be banned. [source: Voter Perceptions of Book Banning]
BOOK BANS ARE VERY EXPENSIVE
They are a waste of taxpayer money, and it pulls teachers and librarians away time educating studentsOne District in Utah spent 20 thousand dollars and spent 500 hours of staff time to review just over 40 challenges, leading to the pulling of 10 books (out of total collection of 200,000) [source: USBE Asst. Superintendent testimony to the Interim Education Committee on Oct 22, 2022 - video]
Granite School District spent $100,000 and 10,000 hours of staff time reviewing books [source: After the Bible was banned, Robert Gehrke says lawmakers are ditching pretense and going for total control]
THE LAW REQUIRES THAT BOOKS MUST BE EVALUATED “AS A WHOLE”, NOT BY EXCERPTS TAKEN OUT OF CONTEXT
One drop of water does not a thunderstorm make - degree and context matters, legally, and with regard to assessing educational valueA few sentences in a book that deal with sexual situations do not automatically make the work as a whole educationally unsuitable, or pornographic. Context matters.
The conservative First Liberty Institute recently made this argument in defense of the bible, which was challenged in a Utah school district for having sexually explicit content in violation of the “bright line” rule. The Institute correctly point out that the bible has great value and must be assessed “as a whole”, rather than banning the book based on sexually explicit passages evaluated out of context. This is both a common sense and legal standard that must be applied to all books, or we will continue to see the bible challenged and removed in other school districts in Utah.
LIBRARIES ONLY PURCHASE FROM MAINSTREAM PUBLISHERS
Mainstream publishers that libraries purchase from don’t print or sell obscene materials.
BOOKS THAT ADDRESS DIFFICULT TOPICS IN AN DEVELOPMENTALLY APPROPRIATE WAY KEEPS KIDS SAFE
Access to developmentally appropriate information helps protect kids and keep them safe from predators and abusersBanning books harms kids and makes them MORE vulnerable to abuse: When kids can’t find reliable, developmentally appropriate information in books, they will driven to the Internet and social media sites to find information — and that puts them in REAL danger of encountering malevolent characters online who can do them harm. Books give kids the language and concepts to protect themselves and their siblings and friends from harm, and helps them to recognize the warning signs of danger or abuse.
THE “BRIGHT LINE RULE” ISN’T VERY BRIGHT - IT PUTS SCHOOL DISTRICTS (AND TAXPAYERS) IN LEGAL JEOPARDY
The so-called “Bright Line” rule is anything but. It puts school districts — and taxpayers - in danger of unnecessary lawsuitsA true “bright line” rule provides crystal clarity regarding what is legal and what is illegal so that one can easily discern the lawful from the unlawful and thus choose to stay on the right side of the line and be protected from any threat of civil or criminal penalties. Yet school district leaders, and the legislature’s own counsel, are clear that the “bright line" rule puts them in legal jeopardy whichever side of the line they are on. (i.e. whether they pull books or leave them on the shelf.)
Michael Curtis (Managing Associate General Counsel, Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel), clearly established the untenable predicament the “bright line” rule has created for LEAs when he said in the October 2022 Interim Education Committee meeting, “What lawsuit does the LEA want to defend, because that’s kind of what they are choosing now.” Later in the meeting Curtis reiterated this point saying, “The dynamic that LEAs are in right now is sort of pick a lawsuit to defend.”
“[P]icking a lawsuit to defend” is literally the opposite effect of a “bright line” rule, and the use of the term is Orwellien in it’s “war is peace”, “freedom is slavery” inversion of meaning. [Source: Video of Oct 2022 committee meeting; See timestamps 1:13:37 and 1:14:10 for Curtis’ comments]
BOOK BANNING IS A WAY TO DISTRACT FROM SOLVING REAL PROBLEMS
If we’re concerned about porn hijacking kids brains, let’s be real about solving the problem.
As Common Sense Media says in their new report "Teens and Pornography", "Today’s teens have more options than previous generations, including generally unfettered access to pornographic websites, social media, and other outlets...
“Personal devices enable more pornography access as well as easier sharing with peers, generally undetected by parents."
If teens want to see sex, they aren’t hiding under their covers with a flashlight reading Toni Morrison, Margaret Atwood, or Shannon Hale — they are typing a few words into their phone and watching explicit videos.
When we water down the definition of “pornography” to apply to books that may touch on themes of sexuality within the context of a larger theme or story, we make it HARDER to deal with the REAL problem.
As author Shannon Hale has said, “In cultures where discussion of sex is taboo, predators flourish.”
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
Tips for Giving Public Comment How to Testify In A Committee (Utah Legislature)
How to talk to Boards: A template for talking with school and library boards about book bans (BookRiot)
Free Webinar Series: Fighting for the First Amendment: Anti-book banning training series (EveryLibrary Institute)
Free Ebook: Utah Libraries: Keystone of Healthy Democracy, Student Success, and Prosperous Communities (Utah Library Advocates)
Guide: How to Fight Book Bans and Censorship (BookRiot)
Video: The Growing Movement to Ban Books (With Jon Friedman, PEN America)